Clarence Thomas is predictably claiming that all of his unreported gifts and suspicious financial transactions are merely bad paperwork, and that he’ll get it all cleaned up with amended filings. The thing is, none of it even makes sense.
For instance, actor and activist Jon Cryer is asking the right question about Clarence Thomas’ latest claims:
Besides being obviously corrupt, this is a very weird setup.
Why would Clarence Thomas’ mother pay insurance and property taxes for a house that is owned by someone else? https://t.co/p3Xdrys96J
— Jon Cryer (@MrJonCryer) April 17, 2023
Cryer is correct. If the real estate transaction was somehow legitimately and above board as Clarence Thomas claims, why would his mother be paying insurance and property taxes on a house she doesn’t own? That’s not how things work, unless there’s something else going on. There’s more to this, and it’ll surely come out soon enough.
Keep up to date with the latest Liberal Agenda content via email.
We respect your privacy.